Truth Essay Essay Example for Free

Truth assay EssayHow should justness be defined based on the knowledge one would contract? on that point are endless theories that try to answer this question. Unfortunately, every scheme has its con rivulet. Would we even know if a theory was the truth? That is not even possible. We could never prove whether a theory was actually truth. It creates a loop. We would have to know what is and isnt truth to prove what is actually true. Is truth comparative, or is it exacting? How would we know?Winkin do a statement about the Dutroux Commission, which was a court case in which a Belgian human named Marc Dutroux was found guilty of murder after he kidnapped, imprisoned and repeatedly raped six girls and polish off four of them, which states . . . the Commission is based on a sort of presupposition that there exists, not a truth, entirely the truth. . . However, as he talked on he stated that he call upd that both Officer Lesage, who said he send Judge Doutrewe a file on D utroux, and that Doutrewe, who denied ever receiving the file, were both telling the truth.He implied that truth is in relation to one person is not necessarily true in relation to some other person. What is true depends on who is making the statement. On another hand, the most popular theory of truth is the equalizer theory. The correspondence theory states that truth is a correspondence between a proposal or judgment and some fact in the real creative activity. This theory assumes that there actually is a real world whose existence does not depend on our own thought, beliefs and perceptions.It assumes that the real world exists and has always existed whether or not we were around to believe it or not. However, this theory is contested. It basis be wrongly assumed that we can confine whether our beliefs correspond to an external realty or just our response to the external world through our senses. peradventure the problem with this is that we cannot define the fact that the statement is suppose to correspond without using the true statement as proof.However, in tune with the correspondence theory, coherence theory states that a belief is true if it is coherent with other beliefs that we regard as true. However, I personally believe that truth is not defined this way at all. You can get a 3 billion people to believe that the sun is a devil llama wizard and the stars are his minions and it would not make it any more true and would probably be proven preposterous eventually. This relates to when people thought the earth was flat or that the sun orbited it.It is clear, with the faults in the correspondence and the coherence theory, more possibilities have been suggested. Possibilities such being that a belief is true if it works or is useable, like the mulish theory. This Pragmatic Theory holds that there is no actual absolute truth. A statement is true if it is useful to believe. It is only true if it is beneficial to us or necessary to survival, if it passes the test of erudition. However, the flaw I call in in this theory is that the wonder that, what if what is beneficial to the human race is not able to pass the test of science?Why would it need to? If it is useful and we believe it why should it have to pass the test of science? Not to mention that if everyone just suddenly believes it, it doesnt necessarily make it true all of the sudden. I side with Winkin. He defines that there are many truth depending on whom you are and who is talking. I campaign to agree with that. This would mean there just may be an actual and absolute truth provided we would never know for sure. This way truth is both relative and absolute. I may believe the relative truth and another may believe that which is absolute.It is also possible that everyone believes a relative truth and the absolute is hidden. It would be impossible to prove what is true and what would not be if we all believed something different to be true. However, that is atro phied scale. There are seven billion people on the planet. Everyone one the whole planet could believe that, bringing the sun digest to the spotlight, the earth is currently orbiting the sun. However, we could all believe it and have the science, as we would believe, to back up the theory but it may not be true at all. Truth can be both relative and absolute.