'Individual Work Motivation Essay\r'

'Be it a multi-national company or a sm every last(predicate) superstore right down the respite of your house, actd and energetic employees be a pre-requisite everywhere in order to reach the zenith of excellence, success and prosperity. In accordance with a research paper root push through from The Ohio State University’s Piketon Research and character Center and Enterprise Center, enthusiastic employees are sought after for the survival and efficiency of a token organization. (Lindner J. R. 1984)\r\nAn assortment of theories exist which suggests the reasons that why the employees in this organization were unable(p) to be energized and elated to perform better and gift their true potential and ability in the learn program which was chalked out by their respective organization. (Lindner J. R. , 1984) Theories and their implications To pop with, expectancy system is a theory that has been drafted out by Victor howl who belongs to the Yale school of Management.\r \nThis theory aptly states that employees in any company would be highly motivated if they firmly believe that more(prenominal) hard work and better functioning would cede to better results, improved outcomes and enhanced rewards such as a tremendous increase in champion’s salary or fringe benefits. (Vroom, n. d) Vroom also throws lights on this exceptionally important item that an employee’s motivation and hence his or her performance is based on numerous factors such as aptitude, skills, personality, experience and the amount of knowledge that he or she possesses.\r\nFollowing this, the attention is now turned to the reinforcing stimulus theory of motivation. This theory was chalked out by B. F. mule driver and his accomplices. The foundation of this theory is the â€Å"law effect”. This gist that an individual behavior have a design to be repeated if the gists and the rewards are confirmative and tends to declines if the consequence are negative. Some of the note-worthy elements of the living theory are positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment and extinction.\r\nRe-inforcement theories Keeping these deuce considerably significant theories in mind, the employees at this particular organization are unable to execute hygienic in the preparedness program because they are provided with less(prenominal) rewards and less positive consequences. Their performance in the grooming program is not co- hitd with the rewards that they would receive. Each employee is paid the analogous amount for attending the program, whether that employee is motivated or not, had passed the psychometric test or not.\r\nHence, employees are not at all passionate and energetic for performing well in the program. Following this, the employees are allowed to retake the training trough the time they pass the exam. This policy makes the employees motivated to ease up out their hundred percent at the training program. Recommendations Ke eping all these factors into consideration, managers of this organization should tightly relate the rewards with the performance and should make use of the theory of positive reinforcement.\r\nManagers should also make sure that the rewards are those that are valued by their employees and are desired by them. Employees should be given the necessary support to foster up their motivation and enthusiasm, such as a mentor or a human imagery manager. Last but not the least, negative reinforcement should be used as tool to motivate the employees by informing them that not performing up to a benchmark and hence not dismissal the training would result in negative rewards such a decrease in one’s pay or the cutting down on some of the fringe benefits.\r\n'